Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?
Top Cited Papers
- 22 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier
- Vol. 363 (9422) , 1724-1727
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(04)16260-0
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Is the Oxidative Modification Hypothesis Relevant to Human Atherosclerosis?Circulation, 2002
- Commentary: Can adult anthropometry be used as a ‘biomarker’ for prenatal and childhood exposures?International Journal of Epidemiology, 2002
- Vitamin C deficiency and risk of myocardial infarction: prospective population study of men from eastern FinlandBMJ, 1997
- Basic Methods for Sensitivity Analysis of BiasesInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 1996
- Lack of Effect of Long-Term Supplementation with Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Malignant Neoplasms and Cardiovascular DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- The Effect of Vitamin E and Beta Carotene on the Incidence of Lung Cancer and Other Cancers in Male SmokersNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- Vitamin E Consumption and the Risk of Coronary Heart Disease in MenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- Vitamin E Consumption and the Risk of Coronary Disease in WomenNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993
- How independent are “independent” effects? relative risk estimation when correlated exposures are measured impreciselyJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Postmenopausal Estrogen Use and Heart DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986