Aid, Nontraded Goods, and the Transfer Paradox in Small Countries
- 1 June 1999
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 89 (3) , 431-449
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.89.3.431
Abstract
This paper constructs a model of the transfer paradox for a small open economy with nontraded goods. It demonstrates that increased production of nontraded goods can change their domestic price so as to offset the otherwise beneficial effect of aid and, under certain conditions, to create a transfer paradox even in a small country. The model is estimated with time-series data for 44 aid-dependent countries for the period 1970–1990. The results support the model and show that the nontraded goods expansion effect is more likely to cause immiserization than Johnson's tariff-distorting export-displacement effect. (JEL F0, O1)Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aid, the Public Sector and the Market in Less Developed CountriesThe Economic Journal, 1987
- Tied Aid and the Paradoxes of Donor-Enrichment and Recipient-ImpoverishmentInternational Economic Review, 1985
- Income Effects and Paradoxes in the Theory of International TradeThe Economic Journal, 1985
- Econometric Issues in the Analysis of Regressions with Generated RegressorsInternational Economic Review, 1984
- Exchange equilibrium and coalitions: An exampleJournal of Mathematical Economics, 1974
- An Econometric Test of Alternative Constraints on the Growth of Underdeveloped CountriesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1972
- Tariffs, capital accumulation and immiserizing growthJournal of International Economics, 1971
- Foreign Assistance: Objectives and ConsequencesEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1970
- The Possibility of Income Losses From Increased Efficiency or Factor Accumulation in the Presence of TariffsThe Economic Journal, 1967
- The Transfer Problem and Transport Costs: The Terms of Trade When Impediments are AbsentThe Economic Journal, 1952