Synchronization in Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Neurons with Sparse, Random Connectivity
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MIT Press in Neural Computation
- Vol. 15 (3) , 509-538
- https://doi.org/10.1162/089976603321192059
Abstract
In model networks of E-cells and I-cells (excitatory and inhibitory neurons, respectively), synchronous rhythmic spiking often comes about from the interplay between the two cell groups: the E-cells synchronize the I-cells and vice versa. Under ideal conditions—homogeneity in relevant network parameters and all-to-all connectivity, for instance—this mechanism can yield perfect synchronization. We find that approximate, imperfect synchronization is possible even with very sparse, random connectivity. The crucial quantity is the expected number of inputs per cell. As long as it is large enough (more precisely, as long as the variance of the total number of synaptic inputs per cell is small enough), tight synchronization is possible. The desynchronizing effect of random connectivity can be reduced by strengthening the E→I synapses. More surprising, it cannot be reduced by strengthening the I→E synapses. However, the decay time constant of inhibition plays an important role. Faster decay yields tighter synchrony. In particular, in models in which the inhibitory synapses are assumed to be instantaneous, the effects of sparse, random connectivity cannot be seen.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Synchronization of the Neural Response to Noisy Periodic Synaptic InputNeural Computation, 2001
- Existence and Stability of Persistent States in Large Neuronal NetworksPhysical Review Letters, 2001
- Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking NeuronsJournal of Computational Neuroscience, 2000
- Stable propagation of synchronous spiking in cortical neural networksNature, 1999
- Class 1 neural excitability, conventional synapses, weakly connected networks, and mathematical foundations of pulse-coupled modelsIEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 1999
- Type I Membranes, Phase Resetting Curves, and SynchronyNeural Computation, 1996
- Inhibition synchronizes sparsely connected cortical neurons within and between columns in realistic network modelsJournal of Computational Neuroscience, 1996
- Properties of sparsely connected excitatory neural networksPhysical Review A, 1990
- Parabolic Bursting in an Excitable System Coupled with a Slow OscillationSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 1986
- The local electric changes associated with repetitive action in a non‐medullated axonThe Journal of Physiology, 1948