Conflicts and Common Interests in Committees
- 1 December 2001
- journal article
- Published by American Economic Association in American Economic Review
- Vol. 91 (5) , 1478-1497
- https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.5.1478
Abstract
Committees improve decisions by pooling members' independent information, but promote manipulation, obfuscation, and exaggeration of private information when members have conflicting preferences. Committee decision procedures transform continuous data into ordered ranks through voting. This coarsens the transmission of information, but controls strategic manipulations and allows some degree of information sharing. Each member becomes more cautious in casting the crucial vote than when he alone makes the decision based on own information. Increased quality of one member's information results in his casting the crucial vote more often. Committees make better decisions for members than does delegation. (JEL D71, D82, C72)Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Sequential Voting Procedures in Symmetric Binary ElectionsJournal of Political Economy, 2000
- AdvocatesJournal of Political Economy, 1999
- Formal and Real Authority in OrganizationsJournal of Political Economy, 1997
- Information Aggregation, Rationality, and the Condorcet Jury TheoremAmerican Political Science Review, 1996
- Information Transmission in DebateAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a HeterogeneousAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- Comparative Statics for OligopolyInternational Economic Review, 1986
- Strategic Information TransmissionEconometrica, 1982
- The Implementation of Social Choice Rules: Some General Results on Incentive CompatibilityThe Review of Economic Studies, 1979
- Manipulation of Voting Schemes: A General ResultEconometrica, 1973