Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Influences on the Management of Resectable Pancreatic Cancer and Its Cost-Effectiveness
Top Cited Papers
- 1 August 2005
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 242 (2) , 235-243
- https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000172095.97787.84
Abstract
We sought to determine the impact of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) on the management of presumed resectable pancreatic cancer and to assess the cost of this new staging procedure. PET using 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) is increasingly used for the staging of pancreatic cancer, but anatomic information is limited. Integrated PET/CT enables optimal anatomic delineation of PET findings and identification of FDG-negative lesions on computed tomography (CT) images and might improve preoperative staging. Patients with suspected pancreatic cancer who had a PET/CT between June 2001 to April 2004 were entered into a prospective database. Routine staging included abdominal CT, chest x-ray, and CA 19-9 measurement. FDG-PET/CT was conducted according to a standardized protocol, and findings were confirmed by histology. Cost benefit analysis was performed based on charged cost of PET/CT and pancreatic resection and included the time frame of staging and surgery. Fifty-nine patients with a median age of 61 years (range, 40-80 years) were included in this analysis. Fifty-one patients had lesions in the head and 8 in the tail of the pancreas. The positive and negative predictive values for pancreatic cancer were 91% and 64%, respectively. PET/CT detected additional distant metastases in 5 and synchronous rectal cancer in 2 patients. PET/CT findings changed the management in 16% of patients with pancreatic cancer deemed resectable after routine staging (P = 0.031) and was cost saving. PET/CT represents an important staging procedure prior to pancreatic resection for cancer, since it significantly improves patient selection and is cost-effective.Keywords
This publication has 37 references indexed in Scilit:
- Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 2004
- A Randomized Trial of Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy after Resection of Pancreatic CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2004
- Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Ultrasound–Guided Fine-Needle Aspiration in Patients With Presumed Pancreatic CancerJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2003
- Pancreaticoduodenectomy With or Without Distal Gastrectomy and Extended Retroperitoneal Lymphadenectomy for Periampullary Adenocarcinoma, Part 2Annals of Surgery, 2002
- Evidence-Based Pancreatic Head Resection for Pancreatic Cancer and Chronic PancreatitisAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- Survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary adenocarcinoma: an updateEuropean Journal of Surgical Oncology, 2001
- Frequency with which surgeons undertake pancreaticoduodenectomy determines length of stay, hospital charges, and in-hospital mortalityJournal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 2001
- The Value of Minimal Access Surgery in the Staging of Patients with Potentially Resectable Peripancreatic MalignancyAnnals of Surgery, 1996
- Further experience with laparoscopy and peritoneal cytology in the staging of pancreatic cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 1995
- The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High-Risk Surgical ProcedureAnnals of Surgery, 1995