Perceived Risk, Trust, and Democracy
- 1 December 1993
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 13 (6) , 675-682
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1993.tb01329.x
Abstract
Risk management has become increasingly politicized and contentious. Polarized views, controversy, and overt conflict have become pervasive. Risk‐perception research has recently begun to provide a new perspective on this problem. Distrust in risk analysis and risk management plays a central role in this perspective. According to this view, the conflicts and controversies surrounding risk management are not due to public ignorance or irrationality but, instead, are seen as a side effect of our remarkable form of participatory democracy, amplified by powerful technological and social changes that systematically destroy trust. Recognizing the importance of trust and understanding the “dynamics of the system” that destroys trust has vast implications for how we approach risk management in the future.Keywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Siting Noxious Facilities: A Test of the Facility Siting CredoRisk Analysis, 1993
- Public Opposition To The Siting Of The High‐Level Nuclear Waste Repository: The Importance Of TrustReview of Policy Research, 1991
- Risk Communication, Knowledge, and Attitudes: Explaining Reactions to a Technology Perceived as RiskyRisk Analysis, 1990
- Technical and Democratic Values in Risk Analysis1Risk Analysis, 1989
- Perception of RiskScience, 1987
- On the confirmability and disconfirmability of trait concepts.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1986
- Risk Management, Assessment, and Acceptability12Risk Analysis, 1985
- Powerline Frequency Electric and Magnetic Fields: A Pilot Study of Risk PerceptionRisk Analysis, 1985
- Risk in a Free Society1Risk Analysis, 1984
- Science, Risk, and Public PolicyScience, 1983