What makes a just healthcare system?
- 21 December 1996
- Vol. 313 (7072) , 1567-1568
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.313.7072.1567
Abstract
Privatisation of health care, seen by many as a panacea in the face of resource constraints, is usually attacked by critics on two fronts: firstly, as failing to achieve the benefits invoked to justify it (greater choice for consumers and providers, increased efficiency, and higher quality of services); and, secondly, as being destructive of the physician-patient relationship.5 There is evidence that privatisation of health insurance is costly, has growing administrative costs, offers less rather than more choice for consumers and providers, and fails to improve the quality of care.6 In a masterly presentation on American health care, Professor Allen Buchanan, professor of philosophy at the …Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Quality and the Medical Marketplace — Following ElephantsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Evaluating the Health Risks of Breast Implants: The Interplay of Medical Science, the Law, and Public OpinionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996
- Judging the Past: The Case of the Human Radiation ExperimentsHastings Center Report, 1996
- Extreme Risk — The New Corporate Proposition for PhysiciansNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- Health Care Reform and the Future of Physician EthicsHastings Center Report, 1994
- Managing medicine: A response to the ‘crisis’Social Science & Medicine, 1991
- Overcoming the prejudice against establishing a national health care system.1991
- A unitary health service for South Africa.1990
- Cost without BenefitNew England Journal of Medicine, 1986