Are arm trajectories planned in kinematic or dynamic coordinates? An adaptation study
- 1 November 1995
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Springer Nature in Experimental Brain Research
- Vol. 103 (3) , 460-470
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00241505
Abstract
There are several invariant features of pointto-point human arm movements: trajectories tend to be straight, smooth, and have bell-shaped velocity profiles. One approach to accounting for these data is via optimization theory; a movement is specified implicitly as the optimum of a cost function, e.g., integrated jerk or torque change. Optimization models of trajectory planning, as well as models not phrased in the optimization framework, generally fall into two main groups-those specified in kinematic coordinates and those specified in dynamic coordinates. To distinguish between these two possibilities we have studied the effects of artificial visual feedback on planar two-joint arm movements. During self-paced point-to-point arm movements the visual feedback of hand position was altered so as to increase the perceived curvature of the movement. The perturbation was zero at both ends of the movement and reached a maximum at the midpoint of the movement. Cost functions specified by hand coordinate kinematics predict adaptation to increased curvature so as to reduce the visual curvature, while dynamically specified cost functions predict no adaptation in the underlying trajectory planner, provided the final goal of the movement can still be achieved. We also studied the effects of reducing the perceived curvature in transverse movements, which are normally slightly curved. Adaptation should be seen in this condition only if the desired trajectory is both specified in kinematic coordinates and actually curved. Increasing the perceived curvature of normally straight sagittal movements led to significant (PP0.05). The results of the curvature-increasing study suggest that trajectories are planned in visually based kinematic coordinates. The results of the curvature-reducing study suggest that the desired trajectory is straight in visual space. These results are incompatible with purely dynamicbased models such as the minimum torque change model. We suggest that spatial perception-as mediated by vision-plays a fundamental role in trajectory planning.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Model of the Learning of Arm Trajectories from Spatial DeviationsJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1994
- Roles of Proprioceptive Input in the Programming of Arm TrajectoriesCold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology, 1990
- Formation and control of optimal trajectory in human multijoint arm movementBiological Cybernetics, 1989
- Aiming error under transformed spatial mappings suggests a structure for visual-motor maps.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1989
- Neural Model of Adaptive Hand-Eye Coordination for Single PosturesScience, 1988
- Neural dynamics of planned arm movements: Emergent invariants and speed-accuracy properties during trajectory formation.Psychological Review, 1988
- Deducing planning variables from experimental arm trajectories: Pitfalls and possibilitiesBiological Cybernetics, 1987
- HUMAN ARM TRAJECTORY FORMATIONBrain, 1982
- Binocular distance perception.Psychological Review, 1980
- On the Nature of Human Interlimb CoordinationScience, 1979