Regulation of Ca2+ Sparks by Ca2+ and Mg2+ in Mammalian and Amphibian Muscle. An RyR Isoform-specific Role in Excitation–Contraction Coupling?

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Ca2+ and Mg2+ are important mediators and regulators of intracellular Ca2+ signaling in muscle. The effects of changes of cytosolic [Ca2+] or [Mg2+] on elementary Ca2+ release events were determined, as functions of concentration and time, in single fast-twitch permeabilized fibers of rat and frog. Ca2+ sparks were identified and their parameters measured in confocal images of fluo-4 fluorescence. Solutions with different [Ca2+] or [Mg2+] were rapidly exchanged while imaging. Faster and spatially homogeneous changes of [Ca2+] (reaching peaks >100 μM) were achieved by photolysing Ca NP-EGTA with laser flashes. In both species, incrementing cytosolic [Ca2+] caused a steady, nearly proportional increase in spark frequency, reversible upon [Ca2+] reduction. A greater change in spark frequency, usually transient, followed sudden increases in [Ca2+] after a lag of 100 ms or more. The nonlinearity, lag, and other features of this delayed effect suggest that it requires increase of [Ca2+] inside the SR. In the frog only, increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] often resulted, after a lag, in sparks that propagated transversally. An increase in [Mg2+] caused a fall of spark frequency, but with striking species differences. In the rat, but not the frog, sparks were observed at 4–40 mM [Mg2+]. Reducing [Mg2+] below 2 mM, which should enable the RyR channel's activation (CICR) site to bind Ca2+, caused progressive increase in spark frequency in the frog, but had no effect in the rat. Spark propagation and enhancement by sub-mM Mg2+ are hallmarks of CICR. Their absence in the rat suggests that CICR requires RyR3 para-junctional clusters, present only in the frog. The observed frequency of sparks corresponds to a channel open probability of 10−7 in the frog or 10−8 in the rat. Together with the failure of photorelease to induce activation directly, this indicates a basal inhibition of channels in situ. It is proposed that relief of this inhibition could be the mechanism by which increased SR load increases spark frequency.