Methodology matters. Comparative validity of three methods for assessment of the quality of primary health care

1 October 1999

journal article
research article
Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in International Journal for Quality in Health Care

Vol. 11 (5) , 429-433
https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/11.5.429

Abstract

Objective.This study compared the sensitivity and specificity of three assessment methods to detect the performance of key clinical tasks by health workers in a primary care setting.

Keywords

ASSESSMENT METHODS
WORKERS
PRIMARY HEALTH
MATTERS
KEY CLINICAL
COMPARATIVE VALIDITY
CLINICAL TASKS
OBJECTIVE.THIS STUDY
CARE OBJECTIVE.THIS

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: