Identification of Patients at High Cardiovascular Risk: a Critical Appraisal of Applicability of Statistical Risk Prediction Models
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Georg Thieme Verlag KG in Methods of Information in Medicine
- Vol. 40 (01) , 6-11
- https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1634457
Abstract
Assessment of cardiovascular risk is widely proposed as a basis for taking management decisions about patients presenting with hypertension or hypercholesterolemia. Our aim was to critically assess the use of risk equations derived from epidemiological studies for the purpose of identifying high-risk patients.Risk equations were retrieved from the MEDLINE database and then applied to a data set of 118 patients. This data set was an evaluation study of the clinical value of the World Health Organization 1993 hypertension guidelines for the decision to treat mild hypertensive patients. We calculated agreement: 1) between equations and 2) between equations and the decision to treat taken by the physician.Most models were not applicable to our population, mainly because the original population had a narrow age range or comprised only males. Between-model agreement was better for the lower and upper risk quintiles than for the three other risk quintiles (0.58, 0.33, 0.34, 0.45, 0.70, from the lower to the upper risk quintile). When using an arbitrary threshold for defining high-risk patients (i.e. >2% per year), we observed a huge variation of the proportion of patients classified at high risk (from 0 to 17%). There was a poor agreement between risk models and the decision to treat taken by the physician. These results suggest that risk-based guidelines should be validated before their diffusion.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Statistical Methods for Rates and ProportionsPublished by Wiley ,2003
- Assessing the Generalizability of Prognostic InformationAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1999
- Prediction of coronary heart disease mortality in Busselton, Western Australia: an evaluation of the Framingham, national health epidemiologic follow up study, and WHO ERICA risk scores.Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 1997
- Differences in Generalists' and Cardiologists' Perceptions of Cardiovascular Risk and the Outcomes of Preventive Therapy in Cardiovascular DiseaseAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Sheffield risk and treatment table for cholesterol lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart diseaseThe Lancet, 1995
- Comparison of probability of stroke between the Copenhagen City Heart Study and the Framingham Study.Stroke, 1994
- Management of raised blood pressure in New Zealand: a discussion document.BMJ, 1993
- Wine, alcohol, platelets, and the French paradox for coronary heart diseaseThe Lancet, 1992
- An updated coronary risk profile. A statement for health professionals.Circulation, 1991
- Representativeness of the Framingham risk model for coronary heart disease mortality: A comparison with a national cohort studyJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987