Modeling Lifetime Earnings Paths: Hypothetical versus Actual Workers
- 1 January 2004
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
To assess the distributional effects of social security reform proposals, it is essential to have good information on real-world workers' lifetime earnings trajectories. Until recently, however, policymakers have relied on hypothetical earnings profiles for policy analysis. We use actual lifetime earnings data from the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) to compare actual workers' covered earnings profiles to these hypothetical profiles. We show that the hypothetical profiles do not track earnings patterns of current retirees; thus lifetime pay levels are much higher than for most HRS workers. Therefore, using hypothetical profiles could misrepresent benefits paid and taxes collected under such reforms.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Intergenerational Earnings Persistence and Economic Inequality in the Long Run: Evidence from French Cohorts, 1931-75Economica, 2018
- ScaledPublished by Iowa State University ,2015
- Comparison of minimum wages and median earningsPublished by Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD) ,2007
- Are Americans Saving "Optimally" for Retirement?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2004
- It's All Relative: Understanding the Retirement Prospects of Baby-BoomersSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Perspectives from the President's Commission on Social Security ReformJournal of Economic Perspectives, 2003
- Federal Tax Policy, Employer Matching, and 401(k) Saving: Evidence from HRS W-2 RecordsNational Tax Journal, 2002
- How Effective is Redistribution Under the Social Security Benefit Formula?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2000
- Lifetime Earnings Patterns, The Distribution of Future Social Security Benefits, And The Impact of Pension ReformSSRN Electronic Journal, 2000