Cutting efficiency of endodontic hand instruments. Part 4. Comparison of hybrid and traditional instrument designs
- 1 September 1988
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Endodontics
- Vol. 14 (9) , 451-454
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0099-2399(88)80134-1
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part III. Comparison of sonic and ultrasonic instrument systemsJournal of Endodontics, 1988
- Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part II: Analysis of tip designJournal of Endodontics, 1986
- Cutting efficiency of endodontic instruments. Part 1: A quantitative comparison of the tip and fluted regionsJournal of Endodontics, 1985
- Cutting ability of square versus rhombus cross-sectional endodontic filesJournal of Endodontics, 1985
- The “balanced force” concept for instrumentation of curved canalsJournal of Endodontics, 1985
- An investigation of the torsional and bending properties of seven brands of endodontic filesJournal of Endodontics, 1984
- The comparative efficiency of four types of endodontic instrumentsJournal of Endodontics, 1982
- Bending and torsion of endodontic files with rhombus cross sectionsJournal of Endodontics, 1982
- Flute design of endodontic instruments: its influence on cutting efficiencyJournal of Endodontics, 1982
- A method to determine the cutting efficiency of root canal instruments in rotary motionJournal of Endodontics, 1980