Systematic Aortic and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy Versus Resection of Bulky Nodes Only in Optimally Debulked Advanced Ovarian Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 20 April 2005
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Vol. 97 (8) , 560-566
- https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/dji102
Abstract
Background: The role of systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with optimally debulked advanced ovarian cancer is unclear and has not been addressed by randomized studies. We conducted a randomized clinical trial to determine whether systematic aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free and overall survival compared with resection of bulky nodes only. Methods: From January 1991 through May 2003, 427 eligible patients with International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage IIIB-C and IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma were randomly assigned to undergo systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy (n = 216) or resection of bulky nodes only (n = 211). Progression-free survival and overall survival were analyzed using a log-rank statistic and a Cox multivariable regression analysis. All statistical tests were two-sided. Results: After a median follow-up of 68.4 months, 292 events (i.e., recurrences or deaths) were observed, and 202 patients had died. Sites of first recurrences were similar in both arms. The adjusted risk for first event was statistically significantly lower in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm (hazard ratio [HR] = .75, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.59 to 0.94; P = .01) than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm, corresponding to 5-year progression-free survival rates of 31.2 and 21.6% in the systematic lymphadenectomy and control arms, respectively (difference = 9.6%, 95% CI = 1.5% to 21.6%), and to median progression-free survival of 29.4 and 22.4 months, respectively (difference = 7 months, 95% CI = 1.0 to 14.4 months). The risk of death was similar in both arms (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74 to 1.29; P = .85), corresponding to 5-year overall survival rates of 48.5 and 47%, respectively (difference = 1.5%, 95% CI = −8.4% to 10.6%), and to median overall survival of 58.7 and 56.3 months, respectively (difference = 2.4 months, 95% CI = −11.8 to 21.0 months). Median operating time was longer, and the percentage of patients requiring blood transfusions was higher in the systematic lymphadenectomy arm than in the no-lymphadenectomy arm (300 versus 210 minutes, P <.001, and 72% versus 59%; P = .006, respectively). Conclusion: Systematic lymphadenectomy improves progression-free but not overall survival in women with optimally debulked advanced ovarian carcinoma.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cancer Statistics, 2004CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 2004
- Survival Effect of Maximal Cytoreductive Surgery for Advanced Ovarian Carcinoma During the Platinum Era: A Meta-AnalysisJournal of Clinical Oncology, 2002
- Cytoreductive Surgery in Advanced Epithelial Cancer of the Ovary: The Impact of Aortic and Pelvic LymphadenectomyGynecologic Oncology, 1995
- Systematic Pelvic and Para-aortic Lymphadenectomy during Cytoreductive Surgery in Advanced Ovarian Cancer: Potential Benefit on SurvivalGynecologic Oncology, 1995
- Technique and feasibility of radical para-aortic and pelvic lymphadenectomy for gynecologic malignancies: a prospective studyInternational Journal of Gynecologic Cancer, 1991
- Patterns of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node involvement in ovarian cancerGynecologic Oncology, 1991
- Survival of ovarian carcinoma with or without lymph node metastasisGynecologic Oncology, 1987
- AnnouncementGynecologic Oncology, 1986
- Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. Analysis and examplesBritish Journal of Cancer, 1977
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958