Acceptor Sites on Chromatin for Receptor Bound by EstrogenVersusAntiestrogen in Antiestrogen-Sensitive and -Resistant MCF-7 Cells*
- 1 March 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Endocrine Society in Endocrinology
- Vol. 118 (3) , 1087-1095
- https://doi.org/10.1210/endo-118-3-1087
Abstract
We examined the chromatin binding characteristics of estrogen receptor from MCF-7 cells when bound by [3H]estradiol vs. the high affinity antiestrogen [3H]H1285 [4-(N,N-diethylaminoethyoxy)4''-methoxy-.alpha.-(p-hydroxyphenyl).alpha.-ethylstilbene]. Two sublines of MCF-7 cells were used: E-3, which is sensitive to antiestrogens, and RR, which is antiestrogen resistant and was selected for its ability to grow in the presence of tamoxifen. Chromatin was prepared from both E-3 and RR cells, linked covalently to cellulose and deproteinized sequentially by 0-8 M guanidine hydrochloride (Gdn.cntdot.HCl). The chromatin acceptor activity unmasked by Gdn.cntdot.HCl was determined using partially purified (30-fold) activated [3H]estradiol- or [3H]H1285-receptor complexes obtained by KCl step elution from DEAE-cellulose columns. With chromatin from E-3 cells, maximal binding (acceptor activity) for [3H]estradiol-receptor complexes prepared from either type of MCF-7 cells (E-3 or RR) was unmasked by 1 and 6 M Gdn.cntdot.HCl, whereas [3H]H1285-receptor complexes exhibited maximal binding to 1 and 4 M Gdn.cntdot.HCl-extracted chromatin subfractions. Chromatin prepared from RR cells was similar to that from E-3 cells in its binding activity for [3H]estradiol-receptor complexes. It differed, however, in that [3H]H1285-receptor complexes showed less chromatin acceptor site binding in general to 1-8 M Gdn.cntdot.HCl-deproteinized RR chromatin, and the binding peak unmasked by 4 M Gdn.cntdot.HCl was absent in chromatin from these cells. Receptor binding to chromatin was stable and was competitively inhibited by radioinert estradiol- or H1285-receptor complexes (but not by denatured receptors), demonstrating the saturability and specificity of these acceptor seites. Thus, estrogen receptor binds differently to chromatin depending on whether estradiol or an antiestrogen is bound to it. In addition, the acquisition of antiestrogen resistance by the RR subline of MCF-7 cells appears to result from alterations in the state of its chromatin rather than changs in the receptor itself. Finally, the observation that the chromatin from the resistant cells differs from that of the sensitive cells suggests that antiestrogens may be able to inhibit the growth of MCF-7 and other antiestrogen-sensitive cells not only by antagonizing the stimulatory effect of estrogens, but also by exerting some separate effect of their own.This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Tissue and Species Specificity of Unmasked Nuclear Acceptor Sites for the Estrogen Receptor of Squalus Testes*Endocrinology, 1986
- Estrogen and antiestrogen binding to rat uterine and pituitary estrogen receptor: Evidence for at least two physicochemical forms of the estrogen receptorThe Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, 1985
- ANTIESTROGENIC POTENCY AND BINDING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE TRIPHENYLETHYLENE H1285 IN MCF-7 HUMAN-BREAST CANCER-CELLS1985
- Binding of [3H]triamcinolone acetonide-receptor complexes to chromatin from the B-cell leukemia line, BCL1Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Cell Research, 1985
- Interaction of the radiolabelled high-affinity anti-oestrogen [3H]H1285 with the cytoplasmic oestrogen receptorBiochemical Journal, 1984
- INDUCTION OF 2 ESTROGEN-RESPONSIVE PROTEINS BY ANTIESTROGENS IN R27, A TAMOXIFEN-RESISTANT CLONE OF MCF7 CELLS1984
- Physical properties of estrogen receptor complexes in MCF-7 human breast cancer cells. Differences with anti-estrogen and estrogen.Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1982
- ESTROGEN-RECEPTOR - DNA INTERACTION - DIFFERENCE BETWEEN ACTIVATION BY ESTROGEN AND ANTI-ESTROGEN1982
- Factors affecting the binding of chick oviduct progesterone receptor to deoxyribonucleic acid: evidence that deoxyribonucleic acid alone is not the nuclear acceptor siteBiochemistry, 1980