The Privatization Of Punishment: Justification, Expectations, And Experience
- 1 March 1989
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Criminal Justice Policy Review
- Vol. 3 (1) , 048-073
- https://doi.org/10.1177/088740348900300103
Abstract
Interest in the privatization of the American correctional system has increased dramatically during the current decade. A number of arguments have been advanced to justify the transfer of correctional responsibilities from the public to the private sector. As with any reform movement, the reasons adduced in support of the movement should be reflected by the policies and practices that are adopted to operationalize the reform. This paper briefly describes the major rationales adduced to justify privatization, then projects the kinds of policies and practices that would be anticipated in view of these rationales. These projections are compared to the actual experience of the privatization movement during the 1980s. The analysis suggests the existence of a considerable lack of fit between expected and actual policies and practices adopted in the process of privatization. Several explanations for this lack of fit are considered.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Private prisons: Problems within the solutionJustice Quarterly, 1987
- Revivification of rehabilitation: Evidence from the 1980sJustice Quarterly, 1987
- The Panopticon Revisited: The Problem of Monitoring Private PrisonsThe Yale Law Journal, 1986
- A Civil Liberties View of Private PrisonsThe Prison Journal, 1985
- A Private Alternative to Public PrisonsThe Prison Journal, 1985
- Private Corrections: Feast or Fiasco?The Prison Journal, 1985
- Correctional Privatization in PerspectiveThe Prison Journal, 1985
- Evaluating Criminal Justice ReformsLaw & Society Review, 1984
- Effective Correctional Treatment: Bibliotherapy for CynicsCrime & Delinquency, 1979
- Correctional Outcome: An Evaluation of 100 ReportsThe Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science, 1966