Extralegal Factors in Felony Sentencing: Classes of Behavior or Classes of People?
- 9 January 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Sociological Inquiry
- Vol. 55 (1) , 62-82
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682x.1985.tb00851.x
Abstract
The radical‐conflict perspective of criminology stresses that legal sanctions are applied more against classes of people than classes of behavior. To test this proposition we took a class of behaviors–sex offenses–and a class of people–designated “normal primitives”–in an attempt to determine which of the groups accounted for more of the variance in sentence severity. We found that although sex offenders enjoyed considerably higher social status than did normal primitives, sex offender status accounted for more than eight times the amount of variance in sentence severity than did normal primitive status after controlling for legally relevant variables. These findings cast doubt on class‐based models of sentencing.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Race, Class, and the Perception of Criminal Injustice in AmericaAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1982
- Ceremonial Justice: Crime and Punishment in a Loosely Coupled SystemSocial Forces, 1979
- Legal Disposition of Inter-Group and Intra-Group HomicidesThe Sociological Quarterly, 1978
- Charge Reduction: An Intermediary Stage in the Process of Labelling Criminal DefendantsSocial Forces, 1977
- Reply to Greenberg, Hopkins, and ReasonsAmerican Sociological Review, 1977
- Is There a Class Bias in Criminal Sentencing?American Sociological Review, 1977
- Socioeconomic Status and Criminal Sentences: Is There an Association?American Sociological Review, 1977
- Socioeconomic Status and Criminal Sentencing: An Empirical Assessment of a Conflict PropositionAmerican Sociological Review, 1975
- Extra-Legal Attributes and Criminal Sentencing: An Assessment of a Sociological ViewpointLaw & Society Review, 1974
- The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order CategoriesAmerican Sociological Review, 1970