Sensitivity and Precision of Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) Methods
- 1 January 1978
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Scandinavian Journal of Haematology
- Vol. 20 (1) , 89-95
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0609.1978.tb01559.x
Abstract
The Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (APTT) test, Cephotest, was compared to other APTT methods in current use in 4 specialized coagulation laboratories. In 3 of 4 laboratories, the sensitivity of Cephotest was superior (P less than 0.001) to that of the local APTT method. There was no statistically significant difference between the APTT methods with regard to precision of repetitive testing. In each laboratory, the normal range of Cephotest was estimated on freshly collected plasma samples from healthy subjects. A mean value between 28.8 and 35.8 s, with a standard deviation of 1.1-3.3 s, was obtained. It is concluded that the composition of the APTT method if of importance for the sensitivity of this test, but does not influence the precision of repetitive testing to a significant degree. The use of a standardized reagent facilitates comparison of the results obtained with the APTT method from one laboratory to another.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comparative Evaluation of a Partial Thromboplastin Reagent Containing a Non-settling, Particulate ActivatorAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1974
- Comparison of Activated Partial Thromboplastin ReagentsAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1973
- Blood-Coagulation Factor VIII: Genetics, Physiological Control, and BioassayPublished by Elsevier ,1966
- Partial thromboplastin time test with kaolin: Normal range and modifications for the diagnosis of haemophilia and Christmas diseaseJournal of Clinical Pathology, 1965
- Carriers of Hemophilia AActa Medica Scandinavica, 1959