Changing a Causal Hypothesis without Changing the Fit: some Rules for Generating Equivalent Path Models
- 1 July 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Multivariate Behavioral Research
- Vol. 21 (3) , 309-331
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr2103_3
Abstract
Since computer programs have been available for estimating and testing linear causal models (e.g. LISREL by Jöreskog & Sörbom) these models have been used increasingly in the behavioral sciences. This paper discusses the problem that very different causal structures may fit the same set of data equally well. Equivalence of models is defined as undecidability in principle and four rules are presented showing how equivalent models may be generated. Rules I and II refer to inversions in the causal order of variables and Rules III and IV to replacements of paths by the assumption of correlated residuals. Three examples are given to illustrate how the rules are applied.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Linear Recursive Equations, Covariance Selection, and Path AnalysisJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1980
- A simple comprehensive model for the analysis of covariance structures: Some remarks on applicationsBritish Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 1980
- Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures.Psychological Bulletin, 1980
- Multivariate Analysis with Latent Variables: Causal ModelingAnnual Review of Psychology, 1980
- Model Search among Multiplicative ModelsBiometrics, 1976
- Environment, social class, and mental abilities.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1972
- The Educational and Early Occupational Status Attainment Process: Replication and RevisionAmerican Sociological Review, 1970
- Principles of Path AnalysisSociological Methodology, 1969