Peer group benchmarks are not appropriate for health care quality report cards
- 31 December 2004
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by Elsevier in American Heart Journal
- Vol. 148 (6) , 921-923
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2004.06.012
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of the choice of benchmark on the conclusions of hospital report cardsAmerican Heart Journal, 2004
- Hospital Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Volume and Patient Mortality, 1998–2000Annals of Surgery, 2004
- The volume-outcome relationship: from Luft to LeapfrogThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2003
- Relationship Between Annual Volume of Patients Treated by Admitting Physician and Mortality After Acute Myocardial InfarctionJAMA, 2001
- Specification issues in measurement of quality of medical care using risk adjusted outcomesJournal of Economic and Social Measurement, 2000
- Relationship of hospital teaching status with quality of care and mortality for Medicare patients with acute MI.JAMA, 2000
- The Association between Hospital Volume and Survival after Acute Myocardial Infarction in Elderly PatientsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Statistical Methods for Profiling Providers of Medical Care: Issues and ApplicationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1997
- Severity-Adjusted Mortality and Length of Stay in Teaching and Nonteaching HospitalsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Outcome of Acute Myocardial Infarction According to the Specialty of the Admitting PhysicianNew England Journal of Medicine, 1996