Accountability Systems: Implications of Requirements of the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001
- 1 August 2002
- journal article
- Published by American Educational Research Association (AERA) in Educational Researcher
- Vol. 31 (6) , 3-16
- https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189x031006003
Abstract
The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 substantially increases the testing requirements for states and sets demanding accountability standards for schools, districts, and states with measurable adequate yearly progress (AYP) objectives for all students and subgroups of students defined by socioeconomic background, race–ethnicity, English language proficiency, and disability. However, states’ content standards, the rigor of their tests, and the stringency of their performance standards vary greatly. Consequently, the percentage of students who score at the proficient level or higher on the state assessments varies radically from state to state. Some states have farther to go than others to meet the mandated target of 100% proficient within 12 years. These differences are illustrated and the implications for achieving AYP targets are discussed. Also addressed are possible uses of results from the biennial state-level administrations of the National Assessment of Educational Progress as a means of leveling the playing field. Factors contributing to the volatility of gains in achievement from year to year for individual schools are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Stability of School-Building Accountability Scores and GainsEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002
- Generalizability Analysis for Performance Assessments of Student Achievement or School EffectivenessEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1997
- Effects of Motivational Interventions on the National Assessment of Educational Progress Mathematics PerformanceEducational Assessment, 1995
- Raising the Stakes of Test Administration: The Impact on Student Performance on the National Assessment of Educational ProgressEducational Assessment, 1995
- Performance Assessment: Policy Promises and Technical Measurement StandardsEducational Researcher, 1994
- The Determination of the Significance of Change Between Pre- and Posttesting PeriodsReview of Educational Research, 1977
- How we should measure "change": Or should we?Psychological Bulletin, 1970