Extended use of disposable pressure transducers. A bacteriologic evaluation
- 21 February 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by American Medical Association (AMA) in JAMA
- Vol. 255 (7) , 916-920
- https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.255.7.916
Abstract
In a prospective randomized study, contamination rates of disposable pressure transducers changed every two days (n = 81) were compared with those changed at four (n = 26) or eight days (n = 50); the mean daily incidence of contamination was 3% for each group. After four days of use, the cumulative prevalences of contamination were similar. However, after eight days, the cumulative prevalence was significantly higher in transducers used without change (6.9%) than in those changed every two days (2.9%). Gram-negative bacilli were present in 63% of contaminated transducers; over half were from the patients'' own flora. The only definite transducer-related bacteremia ocurred on a day of initial contamination and should have been unaffected by the interval of change. Routine use of disposable transducers can be safely extended to four days, even in a busy intensive care unit.This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Bacterial contamination of arterial lines. A prospective studyJAMA, 1983
- Serratia marcescens bacteremia from contaminated pressure transducersJAMA, 1979
- Contamination of Intravenous Infusion Fluid: Effects of Changing Administration SetsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1979
- Failure of Disposable Domes to Prevent Septicemia Acquired from Contaminated Pressure TransducersChest, 1978
- A Semiquantitative Culture Method for Identifying Intravenous-Catheter-Related InfectionNew England Journal of Medicine, 1977
- Pressure monitoring devices. Overlooked source of nosocomial infectionJAMA, 1976
- Pressure Transducers as a Source of Bacteremia after Open Heart SurgeryChest, 1976
- Infection Control in Intravenous TherapyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1973