HPV Vaccination's Second Act: Promotion, Competition, and Compulsion
- 1 October 2010
- journal article
- Published by American Public Health Association in American Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 100 (10) , 1841-1844
- https://doi.org/10.2105/ajph.2010.193060
Abstract
Developments regarding human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines will transform HPV vaccination in the United States while simultaneously raising several new policy and ethical concerns. Policymakers, vaccine manufacturers, and the public health community must now respond to the presence of competing vaccines that are similar but distinct, particularly with respect to genital wart prevention and the benefits of vaccinating males. This work arises in the shadow of the contentious introduction of the HPV vaccine Gardasil (Merck & Co, Inc, Whitehouse Station, NJ) in 2006, particularly the opposition to efforts in many states to require the vaccine for school attendance. I review the current status of HPV vaccine policy in the United States and examine issues of public health ethics and policy central to ongoing and future HPV vaccination programs.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The cost-effectiveness of male HPV vaccination in the United StatesVaccine, 2011
- A Decade of Controversy: Balancing Policy With Evidence in the Regulation of Prescription Drug AdvertisingAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2010
- Human papillomavirus prevalence and type distribution in penile carcinomaJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- Direct to Confusion: Lessons Learned from Marketing BRCA TestingAmerican Journal of Bioethics, 2008
- Genital warts: mountains or molehills?The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2008
- Lessons from the Failure of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine State RequirementsClinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2007
- Mandatory HPV VaccinationPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,2007
- Chapter 2: The burden of HPV-related cancersVaccine, 2006
- Where to begin human papillomavirus vaccination?The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 2006
- Poor sales trigger vaccine withdrawalNature Medicine, 2002