Implications of output-bound measures for laboratory and field research in memory
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- open peer-commentary
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Behavioral and Brain Sciences
- Vol. 19 (2) , 197
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00042229
Abstract
Everyday memory tasks often require that researchers focus on output-bound measures of memory. As a result, nonmemorial processes (e.g., report option and grain size) may influence recall accuracy. These nonmemorial processes, usually eliminated by laboratory researchers, have the potential to explain some anomalous results and may even be useful to enhance everyday recollection.Keywords
This publication has 101 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cues and secrets: Influences on children's event reports.Developmental Psychology, 1994
- Children's memory for a personally experienced event: Implications for testimonyApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1992
- A Maturing of Research on the Behaviour of EyewitnessesApplied Cognitive Psychology, 1991
- A general model of consensus and accuracy in interpersonal perception.Psychological Review, 1991
- A case of misplaced nostalgia.American Psychologist, 1991
- Hierarchical organization in ordered domains: Estimating the dates of events.Psychological Review, 1988
- Accuracy in interpersonal perception: A social relations analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1987
- External correspondence: Decompositions of the mean probability scoreOrganizational Behavior and Human Performance, 1982
- Simpson's paradox and the analysis of memory retrieval.Psychological Review, 1980
- On the psychology of eyewitness testimony.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1977