Maintenance Requirements and Energetic Efficiency of Cows of Different Breed Types
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Animal Science
- Vol. 66 (3) , 764-773
- https://doi.org/10.2527/jas1988.663764x
Abstract
Dry, nonpregnant, mature cows (> 10 yr) of five breeds (Angus, A; Brahman, B; Hereford, He; Holstein, Ho; and Jersey, J) and their crosses (n = 60) were used in a 428-d experiment to determine maintenance energy requirements and efficiency of energy exchange. Cows were fed individually (via Calan electronic gates) a 70% cottonseed hull diet for four consecutive periods (127, 105, 97 and 99 d) at each of four levels (50, 83, 117 and 150% of each animal's estimated maintenance requirement). Each of four cows/breed group was assigned to one of the four feeding levels each period, with one cow fed each level each period. Body composition was measured initially and following each period in all cows via D2O dilution with a two-pool kinetics model procedure. Average ending live weight and empty body weight, protein and fat were similar to beginning values, indicating that cows began and ended in similar body composition. Dry matter digestibility (DMD) following the last period averaged 54.7%. Average DMD was 53.5, 57.8, 52.0, 55.0 and 51.7% (standard error of mean [SE] = 2.1) for A, B, He, Ho and J; values for He and J were lower (P < .05) than for B. Diet digestible energy (DE) was similar for all breed types and averaged 62.4% of gross energy (GE). A small decrease in DE with increasing GE intake was noted for all breed types. The daily metabolizable energy requirement for weight equilibrium for A, B, He, Ho and J differed (P < .01) and was 100, 98, 108, 119 and 152 kcal/kg.75 (SE 4.8), respectively, with an overall mean of 107. The ME for maintenance (MEm) was 91.6, 93.8, 95.3, 115.7 and 140.4 kcal/kg.75 for A, B, He, Ho and J (SE 6.0), respectively, with an overall mean of 101.9. Efficiency of weight change for A, B, He, Ho and J differed (P < .01) and was 116, 135, 80, 116 and 58 g/Mcal ME intake, respectively, with an overall mean of 96. The respective efficiency of ME use for tissue energy gain or loss was 80.6, 66.8, 66.0, 36.5 and 36.2% for A, B, He, Ho and J, with an average energetic efficiency of 60.1%. In general, maintenance requirements for weight and energy equilibrium were lower in beef breeds and their crosses than in dairy breeds and their crosses. Efficiency of ME use also favored the beef breeds over the dairy breeds. It is apparent that differences between body composition and physiological priorities between beef and dairy breeds significantly influence maintenance requirements and efficiency of energy use. Copyright © 1988. American Society of Animal Science . Copyright 1988 by American Society of Animal ScienceThis publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Recovery of Indigestible Fiber from Feces of Sheep and Cattle on Forage DietsJournal of Dairy Science, 1986
- Influence of Body Composition on Energy Requirements of Beef Cows during WinterJournal of Animal Science, 1983
- Extraction and measurement of deuterium oxide at tracer levels in biological fluidsAnalytical Biochemistry, 1979
- Effects of Sex, Diet and Stage of Growth upon Energy Utilization by LambsJournal of Animal Science, 1979
- The utilization of dietary energy by steers during periods of restricted food intake and subsequent realimentaionThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1977
- Fat distribution in steer carcasses of different breeds and crosses. 1. Distribution between depotsAnimal Science, 1976
- Effect of Cow Size and Condition and Ration Protein Content upon Maintenance Requirements of Mature Beef CowsJournal of Animal Science, 1968
- Comparative Digestive Powers of Hereford and Brahman CattleJournal of Animal Science, 1963
- Factors Contributing to the Difference in Dressing Percentage Between Hereford and Brahman × Hereford SteersJournal of Animal Science, 1956