Comparison of Four Methods of Calf Confinement. II. Behavior

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Holstein bull calves (N=46) were blocked by birth order and randomly assigned to be individually reared in stalls, pens or hutches (trials I and II) or as a group in a 3.6 × 7.9 m yard (trial II only). Treatments differed by the degree of restraint and social isolation imposed, with stalls the most restrictive and yard the least. Stalls and pens had wooden slatted floors; hutches and yard were on ground. Calves were placed on treatment within 24 h of birth and remained on treatment 6.5 wk. Total time standing or lying per 24 h in situ at 5 wk was not affected by treatment (P>.05), but hutch calves changed position between standing and lying more often than others (P<.05), in order to remain in sun or shade. At 6.5 wk, calves (N=24) in trial II were individually open-field tested for 20 min in the presence of alien calves. Stall and pen calves performed more actions utilized in locomotion and defense and engaged in more social behavior than hutch or yard calves (P<.05). Only stall and pen calves stumbled and fell, but observations were insufficient to allow statistical analysis of these incidents. Treatment effects were found with respect to vocalizations: stall and pen calves emitted more “baaocks,” while yard calves emitted more “moos.” Results of this study and of a companion physiological study of the calves suggest that the intensification of drives induced by chronic suppression of their release may be accompanied by physiological responses associated with chronic stress. Copyright © 1985. American Society of Animal Science . Copyright 1985 by American Society of Animal Science

This publication has 0 references indexed in Scilit: