The coronation charter of 1100: a postponement of decision. What did not happen in Henry I's reign
- 3 January 1978
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Medieval History
- Vol. 4 (2) , 135-144
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4181(78)90003-9
Abstract
The charter issued by Henry I on his coronation in 1100 has been regarded since Stubb's time as a prefigurement of Magna Carta, since it restricted the rights of the monarch. It has also been seen as a cunning political manoeuvre designed to strengthen the shaky position of Henry I during the tense days and months following the death of William Rufus. The present article does not set out to undermine either of these two positions. The charter played a part in the discussions between the king, the Church and the barons in 1135, 1154 and 1213. There was no such discussion in 1100 when the charter was formulated. At that earlier date the role of the monarch was predominant, as it had been since 1066. As yet the Church and the barons had no active part to play.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- KING STEPHEN AND THE ANGLO‐NORMAN ARISTOCRACY*History, 1974
- The Strange Death of William RufusSpeculum, 1973
- The Anglo-Norman civil war: 11011The English Historical Review, 1973
- Henry I and Robert MaletViator, 1973
- POLITICS AND PROPERTY IN EARLY MEDIEVAL ENGLANDPast & Present, 1972
- WHAT HAPPENED IN STEPHEN'S REIGN 1135–54History, 1964
- Church, Kingship, and Lay Investiture in England, 1089-1135Published by Walter de Gruyter GmbH ,1958
- The Coronation Ceremony in Mediaeval EnglandSpeculum, 1939