Public law litigation and marine affairs: The boldt decision

1 January 1986

journal article
research article
Published by Taylor & Francis in Coastal Zone Management Journal

Vol. 13 (2) , 99-130
https://doi.org/10.1080/08920758609361978

Abstract

The management and conservation of the marine environment and its natural resources are increasingly understood to be issues of public policy with consequences for society at large. On a variety of dramatic occasions over the last decades, the federal judiciary has departed from its traditionally passive role in the shaping of social policy. This paper examines a critical marine controversy, the Boldt Decision (U.S. v. Washington 1974), to illustrate and evaluate nontraditional judicial behavior. The first two sections introduce Indian‐United States treaties concerning Pacific Northwest salmon resources, and the unfolding of the Boldt Decision. A third section argues that a “public law”; model of litigation fits the legal events of the Boldt Decision. A fourth section addresses the competence of the Boldt court as it is manifest in judicial organization, analysis, and implementation. A final section comments on the potential for public law litigation elsewhere in the governing of marine affairs.

Keywords

This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:

The Supreme Court, 1981 Term
Harvard Law Review, 1982
THE BOLDT DECISION
Law & Policy, 1982
The Discretionary Constitution: Institutional Remedies and Judicial Legitimacy
The Yale Law Journal, 1982
The Functions of Courts in the United States, 1950-1980
Law & Society Review, 1981
The Supreme Court, 1978 Term
Harvard Law Review, 1979
The Role of the Judge in Public Law Litigation
Harvard Law Review, 1976
The Supreme Court, 1974 Term
Harvard Law Review, 1975
Environmental Decisionmaking and the Role of the Courts
University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 1974
Judges, Critics, and the Realist Tradition
The Yale Law Journal, 1972
The Relations between State and Federal Law
Columbia Law Review, 1954