Reference Standards, Judges, and Comparison Subjects: Roles for Experts in Evaluating System Performance
Open Access
- 1 January 2002
- journal article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Vol. 9 (1) , 1-15
- https://doi.org/10.1136/jamia.2002.0090001
Abstract
Medical informatics systems are often designed to perform at the level of human experts. Evaluation of the performance of these systems is often constKeywords
This publication has 71 references indexed in Scilit:
- Validation of the Medical Expert System RENOIRComputers and Biomedical Research, 1994
- Monitoring Free-Text Data Using Medical Language ProcessingComputers and Biomedical Research, 1993
- Validation of the medical expert system PNEUMON-IAComputers and Biomedical Research, 1992
- Predicting 1-year outcome following acute myocardial infarction: Physicians versus computersComputers and Biomedical Research, 1990
- A performance evaluation of the expert system ANEMIAComputers and Biomedical Research, 1988
- A Computer Protocol to Predict Myocardial Infarction in Emergency Department Patients with Chest PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Clinical Prediction RulesNew England Journal of Medicine, 1985
- Internist-I, an Experimental Computer-Based Diagnostic Consultant for General Internal MedicineNew England Journal of Medicine, 1982
- Problems of Spectrum and Bias in Evaluating the Efficacy of Diagnostic TestsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1978
- Basic principles of ROC analysisSeminars in Nuclear Medicine, 1978