The Assembly of Species Communities: Chance or Competition?
- 1 December 1979
- Vol. 60 (6) , 1132-1140
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1936961
Abstract
We challenge Diamond's (1975) idea that island species distributions are determined predominantly by competitions canonized by his "assembly rules." We show that every assembly rule is either tautological, trivial, or a pattern expected were species distributed at random. In order to demonstrate that competition is responsible for the joint distributions of species, one would have to falsify a null hypothesis stating that the distributions are generated by the species randomly and individually colonizing an archipelago.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- TESTS OF COMMUNITY‐WIDE CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT AGAINST NULL HYPOTHESESEvolution, 1979
- Using Island Biogeographic Distributions to Determine if Colonization is StochasticThe American Naturalist, 1978
- Distributional Ecology of New Hebridean Birds: A Species KaleidoscopeJournal of Animal Ecology, 1977
- Comparative Ecology of Galapagos Ground Finches (Geospiza Gould): Evaluation of the Importance of Floristic Diversity and Interspecific CompetitionEcological Monographs, 1977
- Species-distance relation for birds of the Solomon Archipelago, and the paradox of the great speciatorsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1976
- Ecological Compatibility of Bird Species on IslandsThe American Naturalist, 1966
- THE EVOLUTION OF BILL SIZE DIFFERENCES AMONG SYMPATRIC CONGENERIC SPECIES OF BIRDSEvolution, 1965