Firm Size Distribution and EPL in Italy
Preprint
- 1 September 2003
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
We study the role of employment protection legislation (EPL) in explaining the relative small average size of Italian firms. We construct a simple model that shows that the smooth relation between size and growth probability is disturbed in proximity of the thresholds at which EPL applies differentially. We use a comprehensive dataset of all Italian firms between 1986 and 1998 to estimate the effects of EPL in terms of discouraging small firms from growing. We then construct a stochastic transition matrix for firm size that, together with the estimates, allows for a quantitative evaluation of the effects of EPL in the long run. Our results show that EPL does influence firm size distribution, but that its effects are quantitatively modest: average firm size would increase by less than 1% when removing the threshold effect. In terms of policy, these findings suggest that changes in EPL are not likely to have a large impact on the propensity of small firms to grow.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Employment Protection Legislation and the Size of FirmsSSRN Electronic Journal, 2003
- Firm Size Distribution and Growth*The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 2003
- The Costs of Wrongful-Discharge LawsPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,2003
- Employment protection in industrialized countries: The case for new indicatorsInternational Labour Review, 2000
- What Determines Firm Size?Published by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1999
- Markov-Perfect Industry Dynamics: A Framework for Empirical WorkThe Review of Economic Studies, 1995
- Entry, Exit, and firm Dynamics in Long Run EquilibriumEconometrica, 1992
- Firing Costs and Labour Demand: How Bad is Eurosclerosis?The Review of Economic Studies, 1990
- Selection and the Evolution of IndustryEconometrica, 1982
- On the Size Distribution of Business FirmsThe Bell Journal of Economics, 1978