Anchoring-and-Adjustment Bias in Communication of Disease Risk
- 3 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Medical Decision Making
- Vol. 29 (2) , 193-201
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989x08327395
Abstract
Over the next decade, advances in genomics will make it increasingly possible to provide patients with personalized, genetic-based risks of common diseases, allowing them the opportunity to take preventive steps through behavioral changes. However, previous research indicates that people may insufficiently adjust their subjective risk to the objective risk value communicated to them by a healthcare provider, a phenomenon called anchoring-and-adjustment bias. In this narrative review, we analyze existing research on how patients process disease-risk information, and the processing biases that may occur, to show that the bias observed in disease-risk communication is potentially malleable to change. We recommend that, to reduce this bias and change patients' misperceptions of disease risk in clinical settings, future studies investigate the effects of forewarning patients about the bias, tailoring risk information to their numeracy level, emphasizing social roles, increasing motivation to form accurate risk perception, and reducing social stigmatization, disease worry and information overload.Keywords
This publication has 47 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Influence of Irrelevant Anchors on the Judgments and Choices of Doctors and PatientsMedical Decision Making, 2007
- Effects of Breast Cancer Risk Counseling for Sexual Minority WomenHealth Care for Women International, 2006
- When effortful thinking influences judgmental anchoring: differential effects of forewarning and incentives on self-generated and externally provided anchorsJournal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2005
- The role of personality in positively and negatively framed risky health decisionsPersonality and Individual Differences, 2005
- Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and RationalityRisk Analysis, 2004
- Lay understanding of terms used in cancer consultationsPsycho‐Oncology, 2003
- First offers as anchors: The role of perspective-taking and negotiator focus.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2001
- Mood and Persuasion: Independent Effects of affect before and after Message ProcessingThe Journal of Social Psychology, 1994
- Projecting Individualized Probabilities of Developing Breast Cancer for White Females Who Are Being Examined AnnuallyJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1989
- Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under RiskEconometrica, 1979