Is there a fundamental difference between stationary and non-stationary double-layer measurements? (Comments on a paper by R. Payne)
- 1 January 1967
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry
- Vol. 15, 101-108
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0728(67)85015-0
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comments on a recent paper, “Experimental and theoretical examination of methods of obtaining double-layer parameters” by J. O'M. Bockriset alJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry and Interfacial Electrochemistry, 1967
- Experimental and theoretical examination of methods of obtaining double-layer parametersJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry (1959), 1965
- The interphase between mercury and aqueous sodium dihydrogen phosphateJournal of Electroanalytical Chemistry (1959), 1965
- Components of Charge and Potential in the Non-diffuse Region of the Electrical Double Layer: Potassium Iodide Solutions in Contact with Mercury at 25°1Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1958
- Ionic Components of Charge in the Electrical Double LayerThe Journal of Chemical Physics, 1954
- The adsorption of potassium halides at the mercury/water interfaceTransactions of the Faraday Society, 1954
- The Potential of the Electrocapillary Maximum of Mercury. IIJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1952
- The Potential of the Electrocapillary Maximum of MercuryJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1949
- The Electrocapillary Curve and its Displacement with Concentration and TemperatureThe Journal of Physical Chemistry, 1935