Encouraging Long-Term Tenure: Wage Tilt or Pensions?
- 1 April 1991
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in ILR Review
- Vol. 44 (3) , 520-535
- https://doi.org/10.1177/001979399104400308
Abstract
The author analyzes data on 6,416 persons in 109 firms to determine whether the length of these workers' tenure was positively related either to wage tilt—the payment of below-market wages in the early years of the worker's employment with a firm and above-market wages in the later years—or to the presence of defined benefit pension plans. Contrary to the popular (but little-tested) hypothesis that wage tilt is important in inducing workers to make long-term commitments to the firm, the results show that wage tilt had no significant effect on tenure, except indirectly through its effect on pension quit costs. In contrast, pensions increased tenure in the firm, on average, by more than 20%.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pensions, Efficiency Wages, and Job MobilityPublished by National Bureau of Economic Research ,1987
- Do Wages Rise with Job Seniority?The Review of Economic Studies, 1987
- Why Federal Workers Don't QuitThe Journal of Human Resources, 1987
- Delayed Payment Contracts and a Firm's Propensity to Hire Older WorkersJournal of Labor Economics, 1986
- Earnings and Pension Compensation: The Effect of EligibilityThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1986
- Is Mandatory Retirement Overrated? Evidence from the 1970sThe Journal of Human Resources, 1983
- Job Mobility and Earnings over the Life CycleILR Review, 1981
- Retirement System Characteristics and Compensating Wage Differentials in the Public SectorILR Review, 1980
- The Pension Acceptance Decision of Older WorkersThe Journal of Human Resources, 1979
- Law Enforcement, Malfeasance, and Compensation of EnforcersThe Journal of Legal Studies, 1974