Prophylaxis ofRhus toxicodendronDermatitis
- 26 January 1950
- journal article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 242 (4) , 130-132
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm195001262420404
Abstract
EVALUATION of the results obtained by prophylactic inoculations of poison-ivy extract is made extremely difficult by factors that cannot be controlled. Some of the variables that impair the validity of conclusions are the following: fluctuation of a person's degree of sensitivity; inconstant environment; avoidance of poison ivy, whenever possible, by sensitive persons, minimizing and making unpredictable the incidence of contact; and spontaneous seasonal (and, lately, chemically induced) changes in vegetation. In addition, some studies depend on the results of patch tests or patients' statements that they have had poison-ivy dermatitis — neither entirely reliable bases for controlled work.1 A review . . .Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rhus Dermatitis as a Public Health and Health Education ProblemAmerican Journal of Public Health, 1947
- Observations on the Relation of Poison Ivy and Poison OakNew England Journal of Medicine, 1938
- Study of the prophylactic action of an extract of poison ivy in the control of rhus dermatitisJournal of Allergy, 1936
- PREVENTION OF DERMATITIS VENENATA DUE TO POISON IVY IN CHILDRENArchives of Dermatology, 1936
- Experiments in poison ivy sensitivityJournal of Allergy, 1936
- UNTOWARD REACTIONS FOLLOWING TOXIN TREATMENT FOR DERMATITIS VENENATAArchives of Dermatology, 1929
- IVY POISONINGJAMA, 1925
- SUCCESSFUL DESENSITIZATION AND TREATMENT OF POISON IVY AND POISON OAK POISONINGArchives of Dermatology, 1924