The Downsian Model Predicts Divergence
- 1 April 2000
- journal article
- other
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Theoretical Politics
- Vol. 12 (2) , 228-240
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692800012002005
Abstract
The `Downsian' model is widely held to predict the convergence of parties to the median in two-party systems with unidimensional policy spaces. We show this is not true, if voters are uncertain. This paper gives an exposition of the two-party divergence results, including (1) if both candidates are free to move, but the incumbent has lower variance of policy action as perceived by voters, then there is no equilibrium, even if preferences are `single-peaked'; (2) if the lower-variance candidate is forced to run on a fixed record, then an equilibrium platform exists for the challenger, but it always diverges from incumbent's platform; (3) if the incumbent's perceived policy once in office has a lower variance than any prospective challenger, the incumbent may win each of a long series of elections even if the incumbent's policy choices diverge from the underlying median of the distribution of voter preferences.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Policy divergence in multicandidate probabilistic spatial votingPublic Choice, 1999
- The elements of candidate reputation: The effect of record and credibility on optimal spatial locationPublic Choice, 1993
- Incumbency Advantage, Voter Loyalty and the Benefit of the DoubtJournal of Theoretical Politics, 1991
- Candidate reputations and the ‘incumbency effect’Journal of Public Economics, 1985
- Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model: Candidate Motivations, Uncertainty, and ConvergenceAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1985
- The Neglected Role of the Status Quo in Models of Issue VotingThe Journal of Politics, 1985
- Self-Interest, Ideology, and Logrolling in Congressional VotingThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1979
- An Expository Development of a Mathematical Model of the Electoral ProcessAmerican Political Science Review, 1970
- Abstentions and equilibrium in the electoral processPublic Choice, 1969
- On the power and importance of the mean preference in a mathematical model of democratic choicePublic Choice, 1968