Clinical and radiographic outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients not treated with disease-modifying drugs
- 1 July 1998
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wiley in Arthritis & Rheumatism
- Vol. 41 (7) , 1190-1195
- https://doi.org/10.1002/1529-0131(199807)41:7<1190::aid-art7>3.0.co;2-b
Abstract
To compare the radiographic and clinical features of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients who were not given disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) with those of RA patients who were followed up and treated with DMARDs at a rheumatology clinic. The population of this case-control study includes a series of RA patients who immigrated to Israel from the previous Union of Soviet Socialist Republics and who were treated only with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Control patients who were followed up and treated with DMARDs at our rheumatology clinic were matched by sex, disease duration, number of actively inflamed joints, and the presence of serum rheumatoid factor. The outcome measures were the number of deformed and radiographically damaged joints. Radiographic damage was evaluated by the methods of Steinbrocker and Sharp. The study population consisted of 22 RA patients (15 women, 7 men) who were not treated with DMARDs and 22 patients (15 women, 7 men) who were treated with DMARDs. The mean disease duration was 16.2 years for the study patients and 14.3 years for the controls. Compared with the matched controls, RA patients who were not treated with DMARDs were found to have a significantly higher mean number of deformed joints (13.8 versus 7.2), a higher mean number of damaged joints (24.4 versus 15.5), and a higher overall damage score by the Sharp criteria (146.1 versus 65.7). RA patients who were not given DMARDs had a 1.57-fold increased number of radiographically damaged joints and a 2.22-fold increased overall Sharp damage score compared with patients who were treated with second-line agents.Keywords
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Effectiveness of Early Treatment with “Second-Line” Antirheumatic DrugsAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1996
- Radiologic evidence of disease modification in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with cyclosporine. results of a 48‐week multicenter study comparing low‐dose cyclosporine with placeboArthritis & Rheumatism, 1994
- The american college of rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1992
- Influence of Methotrexate and Azathioprine on Radiologic Progression in Rheumatoid ArthritisAnnals of Internal Medicine, 1991
- A long‐term prospective study of the use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- The american rheumatism association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- Long‐term prospective trial of low‐dose methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritisArthritis & Rheumatism, 1988
- Effect of sulphasalazine on the radiological progression of rheumatoid arthritis.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1987
- How many joints in the hands and wrists should be included in a score of radiologic abnormalities used to assess rheumatoid arthritis?Arthritis & Rheumatism, 1985
- THERAPEUTIC CRITERIA IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISJAMA, 1949