WISC-R Types of Learning Disabilities
- 1 June 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Learning Disabilities
- Vol. 20 (6) , 369-373
- https://doi.org/10.1177/002221948702000614
Abstract
WISC-R profiles of 119 children in five separate learning disabilities (LD) programs were placed in six homogeneous groups using cluster analysis. A cross-validation procedure supported the reliability of the typology. Achievement test scores also significantly differentiated all six types. LD children in two of the six types were characterized as having WISC-R profiles already identified in the literature and displayed possible reading, attention, and sequencing deficits. A third LDtype is similar to the superior IQ LD child, with motor coordination deficits in addition to severe emotional problems. Three other profiles represent children who have low IQ levels that are consistent with their below average school performance and may not represent true LD children. Based upon this typology, suggestions are made for remedial interventions.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- The WISC-R and Learning Disabilities AssessmentJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
- Diagnostic Implications of Bannatyne's Recategorized WISC-R Scores for Identifying Learning Disabled ChildrenJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
- WISC-R Scatter Indexes of Children Referred for Reading DiagnosisJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1981
- WISC and WISC-R Profiles of Learning Disabled Children: A ReviewLearning Disability Quarterly, 1981
- The myth of the L.D. WISC‐R profileThe Exceptional Child, 1981
- The classification of patients into diagnostic groups using cluster analysisJournal of Clinical Psychology, 1981
- The Literature On Cluster AnalysisMultivariate Behavioral Research, 1978
- Mixture model tests of cluster analysis: Accuracy of four agglomerative hierarchical methods.Psychological Bulletin, 1976
- Programs, Materials and TechniquesJournal of Learning Disabilities, 1974
- An Evaluation of Ten Pairwise Multiple Comparison Procedures by Monte Carlo MethodsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1973