When a mass term does not represent a mass
Open Access
- 1 September 1998
- journal article
- Published by IOP Publishing in European Journal of Physics
- Vol. 19 (5) , 419-423
- https://doi.org/10.1088/0143-0807/19/5/002
Abstract
The definition of mass of a scalar field in a curved space has often been generalized by grouping coupling terms between the field and the Ricci curvature with non-curvature-related mass terms. In a broader point of view, one sees that a common misunderstanding resulting from such an identification leads one, in the case of the spin-2 field, to regard the cosmological constant as a non-vanishing mass of cosmological origin for the graviton. Similarly, there are inconsistencies for the spin-1 field. Instead, the intrinsic mass of a field should be regarded as being independent of the background curvature.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Radiation damping in a gravitational fieldPublished by Elsevier ,2004
- Comment on Zero-Point Fluctuations and the Cosmological ConstantThe Astrophysical Journal, 1996
- On the tail problem in cosmologyPhysics Letters A, 1992
- Huygens’ principle and characteristic propagation property for waves in curved space-timesJournal of Mathematical Physics, 1992
- Gauge invariance versus masslessness in de Sitter spacesAnnals of Physics, 1984
- On general-relativistic and gauge field theoriesFoundations of Physics, 1978
- Classical quark confinement from general relativityPhysics Letters A, 1978
- Finite-Range GravitationThe Astrophysical Journal, 1969
- On the question of a cosmological rest-mass of gravitonsInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1968
- Comments on the scalar-tensor theoryInternational Journal of Theoretical Physics, 1968