Lymph node metastasis as a significant prognostic factor in gastric cancer: a multiple logistic regression analysis
- 1 January 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology
- Vol. 39 (4) , 380-384
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00365520310008629
Abstract
Background: In Japan, the standard treatment policy for all potentially curable patients with gastric cancer is radical resection including extensive lymphadenectomy. This treatment strategy has been used for both early and advanced gastric cancers, and substantial increases in survival time have been reported. In advanced gastric cancer, lymphatic spread is reported to be one of the most relevant prognostic factors for gastric cancer resected for cure. The purpose of this study was to determine the factors affecting lymph node involvement and to establish guidelines for the extent of lymph node dissection most appropriate for the treatment of gastric cancer. Methods: The clinicopathological features of 926 patients with gastric cancer were reviewed. Information on the clinicopathological features was obtained from the database of gastric cancer at the Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Sendai National Hospital. Univariate and multivariate analyses of data for patients with gastric cancer tumors were performed to evaluate the prognostic significance of clinicopathological features. The independent risk factors influencing lymph node metastasis were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis. Results: The following clinicopathologic factors were found to be correlated with prognosis of gastric cancer: (1) macroscopic type, (2) depth of invasion, (3) cancer‐stromal relationship, (4) histological growth pattern, (5) lymph node involvement, (6) lymphatic invasion, (7) vascular invasion and (8) tumor site. However, a multivariate analysis revealed that macroscopic type, depth of invasion, lymph node involvement and tumor site are independent risk factors for the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Among these factors, the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer was most strongly influenced by lymph node involvement (odds ratio, 4.632). According to a multiple logistic regression model, depth of cancer invasion and lymphatic invasion was significantly correlated with lymph node metastases. Conclusions: Lymph node involvement has the strongest influence on the prognosis of gastric cancer. Among the clinicopathological factors, depth of invasion and microscopically lymphatic invasion are important factors in predicting lymph node metastases. Thus, the ability to perform gastrectomy with dissection of lymph nodes is a basic requirement for gastric cancer surgeons.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Treatment strategy of limited surgery in the treatment guidelines for gastric cancer in JapanThe Lancet Oncology, 2003
- Gastric cancer treatment guidelines in JapanGastric Cancer, 2002
- Early and Late Recurrences after Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Multiple Logistic Regression AnalysisUpsala Journal of Medical Sciences, 2002
- Influence of the number of lymph nodes examined on staging of gastric cancerBritish Journal of Surgery, 2001
- Current status and future perspectives in gastric cancer managementCancer Treatment Reviews, 2000
- Japanese Classification of Gastric Carcinoma – 2nd English Edition –Gastric Cancer, 1998
- The Number of Metastatic Lymph Nodes: A Promising Prognostic Determinant for Gastric Carcinoma in the Latest Edition of the TNM ClassificationJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 1998
- Lymph Node Metastases in Gastric Cancer: Significance of Positive NumberOncology, 1995
- Gastric cancer in a general hospital in JapanSeminars in Surgical Oncology, 1994
- Prognostic significance of the number of positive lymph nodes in gastric carcinomaBritish Journal of Surgery, 1994