The Impact of Histological Review on Clinical Management of Testicular Cancer
- 1 June 1993
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Urology
- Vol. 71 (6) , 736-738
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-410x.1993.tb16076.x
Abstract
Summary— Accurate histological diagnosis and staging are critically important in determining the optimal management of patients with testicular cancer. We have assessed the importance of histological review of “outside” pathology reports from 87 patients referred to the Urological Cancer Research Unit. In 28 patients (32%), the reviewed pathology report differed from the outside report. In 10 of these patients (11%), the pathology review resulted in a change of treatment or prognosis from that which would have obtained in the absence of such histological review. Pathology review at a major cancer centre with a subspecialist interest in tumour pathology and a large experience in the management of germ cell malignancy is an essential first step in the treatment of testicular cancer.Keywords
This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit:
- Surveillance for Stage I Non‐seminomatous Germ Cell Tumours of the Testis: the Optimal Protocol Has Not Yet Been DefinedBritish Journal of Urology, 1988
- FURTHER ADVANCES IN THE MANAGEMENT OF MALIGNANT TERATOMAS OF THE TESTIS AND OTHER SITESThe Lancet, 1983
- Hypothesis: when is a seminoma not a seminoma?Journal of Clinical Pathology, 1981