Cups and glasses: learning that boundaries are vague
- 1 April 1975
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Journal of Child Language
- Vol. 2 (1) , 79-103
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0305000900000908
Abstract
The boundaries of many categories, and hence the boundaries between their names, are often vague (Lehrer 1970, Labov 1973). At the same time, the child who is just learning the denotation of a word often makes ‘mistakes’ and may over-extend words to include objects that do not belong to the adult category (e.g. Clark 1973). The present study is concerned with when children learn that boundaries are vague. It was hypothesized that children would first over-extend the use of terms such as cup and define the domain of denotation discretely on the basis of one or two perceptual factors, and only later would they learn that category boundaries are often vague because of the interdependence of physical and functional (i.e. cultural) properties. Children aged 3, 6, 9 and 12 years were asked to name and to sort twenty-five different drinking vessels; then they were asked for definitions of cup and glass and were also asked to choose the best exemplar present of each category. The results showed that children go through three stages. First, they over-extend the term cup. Next, they focus only on certain perceptual properties. Finally, they show growing awareness of functional properties and hence of the vagueness of the boundary between cups and glasses.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Studies in Linguistic SemanticsAmerican Speech, 1979
- More about less: A study of language comprehensionJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1973
- On the child's acquisition of antonyms in two semantic fieldsJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1972
- On the acquisition of the meaning of before and afterJournal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 1971
- The Structure of a Semantic TheoryLanguage, 1963
- Componential Analysis and the Study of MeaningLanguage, 1956