Must Growth Restrictions Eliminate Moderate–Priced Housing?
- 30 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of the American Planning Association
- Vol. 52 (3) , 319-325
- https://doi.org/10.1080/01944368608976438
Abstract
Researchers have been too quick to blame growth controls for the scarcity of moderate-priced housing. The annual trend in percentage of moderate-priced units sold in Boulder, Colorado, confirms that affordable housing need not disappear as a result of growth limitations. The price of new single-family detached homes in Boulder did increase after the city enacted its growth limitation ordinance, but new detached homes represented a minority of housing opportunity. While fewer moderate-priced detached homes were produced in Petaluma, California, and Boulder after growth control was enacted, small attached units flourished in Boulder, providing opportunity for people of modest means to purchase housing. Because of planning policy and market demand, exclusion of lower-income households was avoided in Boulder but not in Petaluma.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Suburban SqueezePublished by University of California Press ,1984
- The Effect of Growth Control on the Production of Moderate-Priced HousingLand Economics, 1984
- Suburban growth controls and the price of new housingJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1981
- THE EFFECT OF LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS ON HOUSING COSTSPolicy Studies Journal, 1979
- Effects of an Urban Growth Management System on Land ValuesLand Economics, 1979
- Suburban Growth Controls: An Economic and Legal AnalysisThe Yale Law Journal, 1977