Discordance between patients and their physicians in the assessment of lupus disease activity: relevance for clinical trials
- 1 October 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Lupus
- Vol. 8 (8) , 660-670
- https://doi.org/10.1191/096120399680411362
Abstract
Discordance between patient and physician assessment of lupus activity occurs frequently and its determinants are not known. Examples of discordance between patients and physicians in other disease models can be found in the literature. A better understanding of the discordance between patients and physicians can help us achieve a shared decision-making model of health care, improve patient satisfaction, improve patient compliance, and improve physician understanding of how lupus impacts on their patients. Understanding discordance also impacts on the design and interpretation of clinical trials.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why doctors and patients disagreeRheumatology, 1998
- Doctors and patients don't agree: cross sectional study of patients' and doctors' perceptions and assessments of disability in multiple sclerosisBMJ, 1997
- Why do patients turn to complementary medicine? An empirical studyBritish Journal of Clinical Psychology, 1996
- Comparison of clinical and self reported diagnosis for rheumatology outpatients.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1995
- RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS CANNOT ACCURATELY REPORT SIGNS OF INFLAMMATORY ACTIVITYRheumatology, 1995
- Comparison of Oral Health Ratings by Dentists and Dentate EldersJournal of Public Health Dentistry, 1993
- Patient education and the consultation: the importance of lay beliefs.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1991
- Who should measure quality of life, the doctor or the patient?British Journal of Cancer, 1988
- Assessing physician/patient perceptions in rheumatoid arthritis. A vital component in patient educationArthritis & Rheumatism, 1985
- Doctor-Patient CommunicationJAMA, 1984