On the Validity of the Portable Rod-and-Frame Test
- 1 April 1971
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Perceptual and Motor Skills
- Vol. 32 (2) , 434
- https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1971.32.2.434
Abstract
Kato (1965) and Morris (1967) have reported correlations between stationary Rod-and-frame Tests (RFT; Witkin, Lewis, Hertzman, Machover, Meissner, & Wapner, 1954) and portable versions of their own design of .77 and .74, respectively. However, Vaught (1969) reports a correlation between a commercially available version and a stationary RFT of .44 for men, .41 for women, and .46 over-all.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- Correlations between Scores for a Portable RFT and a Stationary RFTPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1969
- The Rod-and-Frame Test: Some Comments on MethodologyPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1968
- The Rod-and-Frame Box: A Portable Version of the Rod-and-Frame TestPerceptual and Motor Skills, 1967
- THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF NEW ROD FRAME TESTJapanese Psychological Research, 1965