Rehabilitation in the new juvenile court: Do judges support the treatment ethic?
- 1 March 1997
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in American Journal of Criminal Justice
- Vol. 21 (2) , 181-212
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02887449
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Judges in the punitive juvenile court: Organizational, career and ideological influences on sanctioning orientationJustice Quarterly, 1997
- Rethinking the Sanctioning Function in Juvenile Court: Retributive or Restorative Responses to Youth CrimeCrime & Delinquency, 1995
- Understanding the response to reforms limiting discretion: Judges' views of restrictions on detention intakeJustice Quarterly, 1994
- Explaining detention worker orientation: Individual characteristics, occupational conditions, and organizational environmentJournal of Criminal Justice, 1994
- Juvenile Justice Reform and the Difference it Makes: An Exploratory Study of the Impact of Policy Change on Detention Worker AttitudesCrime & Delinquency, 1994
- An Integration of Theories to Explain Judicial DiscretionSocial Problems, 1991
- Court Structure, Defense Attorney Use, and Juvenile Court DecisionsThe Sociological Quarterly, 1986
- Traditional Rhetoric, Organizational Realities: Remand of Juveniles to Adult CourtCrime & Delinquency, 1986
- Is child saving dead? Attitudes toward juvenile rehabilitation in IllinoisJournal of Criminal Justice, 1983
- Implementing Determinate Sentencing in Illinois: Conscience and ConvenienceCriminal Justice Review, 1983