Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Political Analysis
- Vol. 8 (1) , 35-56
- https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pan.a029804
Abstract
This paper shows that agnostic spatial models that simultaneously attempt to estimate legislators' preferred points and ideological locations for the proposals on which they vote, such as the well-known NOMINATE model of Poole and Rosenthal, are not identified. The problem arises because the agnostic estimators inherit the granularity of the voting data and, so, cannot recapture the underlying continuous parameter space. I propose an alternative estimator that achieves identification by modeling the agenda.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Rasch ModelsPublished by Springer Nature ,1995
- Patterns of Congressional VotingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1991
- Traits versus Issues: Factor versus Ideal-Point Analysis of Candidate Thermometer RatingsPolitical Analysis, 1990
- Maximum Likelihood Estimation of Item Response Parameters when Some Responses are OmittedPsychometrika, 1983
- A STATISTICAL MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING METHOD BASED ON THE SPATIAL THEORY OF VOTINGPublished by Elsevier ,1978
- Maximum Likelihood Estimates in Exponential Response ModelsThe Annals of Statistics, 1977
- Theoretical StatisticsPublished by Springer Nature ,1974
- Spatial Models of Party CompetitionAmerican Political Science Review, 1963
- BIAS IN THE ESTIMATION OF AUTOCORRELATIONSBiometrika, 1954
- A method of scaling psychological and educational tests.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1925