When and How Do Domestic Constraints Matter?
- 1 September 1993
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Journal of Conflict Resolution
- Vol. 37 (3) , 403-426
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0022002793037003001
Abstract
Recent studies of uncertainty in international relations treat nation-states as unitary actors, but it may be more realistic to suppose that uncertainty also arises from domestic decision-making processes. By formalizing Putnam's theory of two-level games, this article attempts to integrate the studies of uncertainty and the “second image.” The distinction between domestic and international asymmetric information turns out to be subtle yet important. When there is complete information and international asymmetric information, domestic constraints may or may not enhance bargaining power; but they do not make successful ratification difficult. On the other hand, when there is incomplete domestic information, successful ratification is not guaranteed although the expected payoffs of the constrained negotiators may be still greater than without domestic constraints.Keywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Signaling Difficulties with Linkage in Crisis BargainingInternational Studies Quarterly, 1992
- Nuclear Deterrence, Counterforce Strategies, and the Incentive to Strike FirstAmerican Political Science Review, 1991
- Equilibrium Behavior in Crisis Bargaining GamesAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1990
- Capabilities, Uncertainty, and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis BargainingAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- Nuclear Deterrence and the Strategy of Limited RetaliationAmerican Political Science Review, 1989
- Reputation and Hegemonic Stability: A Game-Theoretic AnalysisAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Nuclear Brinkmanship with Two-Sided Incomplete InformationAmerican Political Science Review, 1988
- Crisis Bargaining, Escalation, and MADAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- The Institutional Foundations of Committee PowerAmerican Political Science Review, 1987
- The Art & Science of NegotiationHarvard Law Review, 1983