The future of health behavior change research: What is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 February 2004
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Vol. 27 (1) , 3-12
- https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324796abm2701_2
Abstract
Background: It is well documented that the results of most behavioral and health promotion studies have not been translated into practice.Purpose: In this article, reasons for this gap, focusing on study design characteristics as a central contributing barrier, are discussed.Methods: Four reviews of recent controlled studies in work sites, health care, school, and community settings are briefly discussed and summarized. Their implications for future research and for closing the gap between research and practice are then discussed.Results: These reviews come to consistent conclusions regarding key internal and external validity factors that have and have not been reported. It is very clear that moderating variables and generalization issues have not been included or reported in the majority of investigations, and that as a consequence little is known about the representatives or the robustness of results from current studies.Conclusions: To significantly improve the current state of affairs, substantial changes will be required on the part of researchers, funding agencies, and review and editorial boards. In conclusion, recommendations for each of these entities are provided.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Don’t We See More Translation of Health Promotion Research to Practice? Rethinking the Efficacy-to-Effectiveness TransitionAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2003
- A population perspective to evidence based medicine: "evidence for population health"Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 2002
- The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized TrialsJAMA, 2001
- Reliable assessment of the effects of treatment on mortality and major morbidity, I: clinical trialsThe Lancet, 2001
- Disease impact number and population impact number: population perspectives to measures of risk and benefit Commentary: DINS, PINS, and things---clinical and population perspectives on treatment effectsBMJ, 2000
- Implementation and Effectiveness of a Brief Smoking-Cessation Intervention for Hospital PatientsMedical Care, 2000
- Developing the guide to community preventive services—overview and rationale11The names and affiliations of the Task Force members are listed on page v of this supplement and at http://www.thecommunityguide.org.American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2000
- Improving the transition from basic efficacy research to effectiveness studies: Methodological issues and procedures.Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 1995
- A Smoking-Cessation Intervention for Hospital PatientsMedical Care, 1993
- Avoiding Type III Errors in Health Education Program Evaluations: A Case StudyHealth Education Quarterly, 1985