Countertransference and reality
- 1 January 1991
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Psychoanalytic Dialogues
- Vol. 1 (1) , 52-73
- https://doi.org/10.1080/10481889109538885
Abstract
The psychoanalytic situation provides many opportunities for people to observe their analysts closely. These observations are inevitably woven into the fabric of patients’ transference experience. Because the observations can be uncomfortable for the analyst, there is a constant temptation to ignore or deny the plausibility of patients’ perceptions. They can be, and often are, quickly reinterpreted as derivatives of sexual or aggressive urges. Psychoanalytic drive theory, with its emphasis on impulse rather than observation as the force behind transference experience, can encourage counter‐transferential disclaimers and lead to blind spots. Some technical suggestions are offered to avoid this tendency and are based on a relational understanding of the nature of transference.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Theoretical Models and the Analyst's NeutralityContemporary Psychoanalysis, 1986
- The Concept of Psychic Reality and Related ProblemsJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1985
- The Patient as Interpreter of the Analyst's ExperienceContemporary Psychoanalysis, 1983
- The Interpersonal Paradigm and the Degree of the Therapist's InvolvementContemporary Psychoanalysis, 1983
- Denial and RepressionJournal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 1957
- Pseudoimbecility: A Magic Cap of InvisibilityPublished by Taylor & Francis ,1942